Re: [ferret_users] strange behavior with inverse fft

[golla nageswararao <ezeenag4u@xxxxxxxxx>]

Nothing much....
I wrote a jnl file using commands fft_re, fft_im and inverse fft for filtering low frequency signals from SSHA data. It worked very well. Since I lost the listed netcdf file, I ran the same jnl file with same dataset in some other pc but strangely output of the jnl was entirely different. What could be the reason?

Thanks in advance.

On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 10:42 PM, Ansley Manke <Ansley.B.Manke@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hi
We would need to see more details about this.  There is no reason that should occur.

Ansley

On 11/13/2011 6:46 PM, golla nageswararao wrote:

Hi all,
 I recently used fft_re, fft_im and inverse fft for considering only desired signals in my time series data and I could achieved it. But when I used the same jnl, same dataset two days before and run it, the results are different. Why it is so like that? The data was not filtered. How could it happen like that...?

Thanks in advance.

--
With Best regards,
G.NageswaraRao,

-- 
With Best regards,
G.NageswaraRao,