[Thread Prev][Thread Next][Index]
[ferret_users] strange behavior with inverse fft
- To: ferret_users@xxxxxxxx
- Subject: [ferret_users] strange behavior with inverse fft
- From: golla nageswararao <ezeenag4u@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 08:16:25 +0530
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=WEhh+/6JTLwElqH6xztXSiYD2nOyeqZjsf3m8czbVzs=; b=tJ+xKGvCjY/FRRLD7DfRUochKullaZ3b+GzKIJLMPCMB1xwsP+GRgW3Mr3VGfwnxeJ dV5IoiNmEEDHHRJfsuWszBDElr7NUa+DI5P0Ix1aycO1hvJn5rYFeuPfrKD4+P3IVdIs dtzIzzDDA5XwL9mavQP1LSBcJ3OS93sx721/U=
- Sender: owner-ferret_users@xxxxxxxx
Hi all,
I recently used fft_re, fft_im and inverse fft for considering only desired signals in my time series data and I could achieved it. But when I used the same jnl, same dataset two days before and run it, the results are different. Why it is so like that? The data was not filtered. How could it happen like that...?
Thanks in advance.
--
With Best regards,
G.NageswaraRao,
[Thread Prev][Thread Next][Index]
Contact Us
Dept of Commerce /
NOAA /
OAR /
PMEL /
Ferret
Privacy Policy | Disclaimer | Accessibility Statement