Re: [las_users] size for time axis

[Jonathan Callahan <jonathan.s.callahan@xxxxxxxx>]

Ben,

I agree that needing to start/size instead of start/end is not 
particularly human-friendly.  For now, however, this is all we support 
for LAS 6.x.  We'll see about addressing this issue as we move forward 
with development of the new 'Armstrong' LAS.

-- Jon

Ben Burford wrote:
> Hello LASers,
>
> My current definition of the time range that I put in my xml files looks lik
> e this:
>
>  <Insitu_Surface_T display_lo="2002-Oct-01 01:00:00" display_hi="2004-Dec-31
>  23:00:00" units="hours" type="t">
>   <arange start="2002-Oct-01 01:00:00" step="1" size="19751"/>
>  </Insitu_Surface_T>
>
> Is it possible to define the time range without specifying "size" (size="197
> 51")?  Its a pain in the neck to calculate size (number of hours) for the va
> riety of time periods of data that I need to add to my system.
>
> I tried different combinations of the above xml content without including si
> ze but got errors in every case.  I'm hoping someone can show me a format of
>  xml that works, without the "size=".
>
> Thank you,
>
> Ben
>
>
>