Okay, I see why you are confused now. Your time axis does indeed have 12 points (as you can see in the #pts column, for the month_reg time row). Because the time axis is now modulo, it 'wraps around'. Thus saying yes? shade uwnd_climatology[l=13] ...is equivalent to saying... yes? shade uwnd_climatology[l=1] in this case. You can explicitly test this by plotting both of them if you like. (or shade l=13 minus l=1, which should give you zero everywhere) In the same way, l=14 is equivalent to l=2 or so on. An easy example of why a modulo axis makes sense is the case of longitudes. For a modulo axis of longitude, x=361 is the same as x=1. For a climatology a modulo axis is also sensible. For example, imagine forcing a model with the climatology, in year two, we want January (l=13) to be the same as in year one (l=1). and so on. Neil --------------------------------------------------- Neil Swart Climate Modelling Group School of Earth and Ocean Sciences University of Victoria Victoria, BC Canada On Jul 11, 2011, at 12:26 AM, Izidine Pinto wrote: Hi, |