U.S. Dept. of Commerce / NOAA/ OAR / PMEL / Publications


The influence of El Niño on the equatorial Pacific contribution to atmospheric CO2 accumulation

Richard A. Feely

Pacific Marine Environmental Laboratory, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Seattle, Washington

Rik Wanninkhof

Atlantic Oceanographic and Meteorological Laboratory, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Miami, Florida

Taro Takahashi

Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, Columbia University, Palisades, New York

Pieter Tans

Climate Monitoring and Diagnostics Laboratory, Boulder, Colorado

Nature, 398, 597–601 (1999)
Copyright 1999 Macmillan Publishers Ltd. Further electronic distribution is not allowed.

Gallery of Figures and Tables

Figure 1. CO2 disequilibria and sea-to-air fluxes in the equatorial Pacific. The distributions of pCO2 (see text) in atm (left) and CO2 flux in mol m-2 yr-1 (right) in the central and eastern equatorial Pacific are for two field seasons in the boreal spring and autumn of 1992; the spring of 1993; the spring and autumn of 1994; and spring/summer and autumn/winter of 1996. The lower pCO2 values during 1992–94 ENSO event, combined with lower wind speeds, resulted in a significant decrease in the CO2 flux compared with the 1996 non-El Niño year. 'Under' atmospheric and surface ocean pCO2 measurements and supporting hydrographic data were obtained during these cruises on board the NOAA Ships Discoverer, Malcolm Baldrige and Ka'imimoana. The 'underway' measurements of CO2 mixing ratios in dry air were made with a Li-Cor (Model 6251) non-dispersive infrared analyser linked to the shipboard equilibrator following the methods described in ref. 29. The system runs on an hourly cycle during which standards, a headspace sample from the equilibrator, and an ambient air sample are analysed. Standards were obtained from NOAA's Climate Monitoring Diagnostics Laboratory (CMDL) at Boulder. All reference standards undergo a pre- and post-cruise calibration at CMDL against standards certified by the World Meteorological Organization (WMO).

Figure 2. Time series of pCO2. The data are from cruises during the boreal spring between 1992–1994 and 1996 (SST, sea surface temperature). The month of observations is listed in the key. a, Time series along 110°W. b, The pCO2 versus the temperature at the temperature minimum along 110°W.

 

Figure 3. Long time series of seawater and atmospheric pCO2. The region of coverage is the central equatorial Pacific between 140°W and 160°W. The seawater values have been corrected to a constant temperature of 25°C to remove the effect of temperature on CO2 solubility. Data Sources: 1961, Keeling et al. (1965); 1984, Feely et al. (1987); 1988, Murphy et al. (1994); 1989, Murphy et al. (1994); 1989, Inoue and Sugimura (1992); 1996, Feely et al. (this work).

 

Table 1. Estimates of the equatorial Pacific sea-air CO2 flux.


 
Annual equatorial Pacific
Annual equatorial Pacific
Annual atmospheric
Per cent of atmospheric
 
flux
flux anomaly*
flux anomaly**
anomaly due to the
Year
(Pg C)
(Pg C)
(Pg C)
equatorial Pacific ENSO

1992
0.3 ± 0.2
–0.6 ± 0.4
–1.69
36
1993
0.6 ± 0.4
–0.3 ± 0.3
–1.84
16
1994
0.7 ± 0.5
–0.2 ± 0.3
0.09
NA
1996
0.9 ± 0.6
0.0
–0.03
NA

NA, Not applied.

*Equatorial Pacific flux — 1996 equatorial Pacific flux. From an analysis of seasonal and interannual datasets. The uncertainties are composed of the seasonal variations of pCO2w (28%), wind speed variability (28%), and the wind-speed dependence of gas exchange (44%). The region of coverage for the equatorial Pacific flux estimates is from 10°S to 10°N and from 80°W to 135°E.

** Difference between measured atmospheric annual CO2 increase and a long-term average annual increase of 3.18 PgC (ref. 19).


Go back to text or abstract

PMEL Outstanding Papers

PMEL Publications Search

PMEL Homepage