Hello, well, the data are the data and maybe that patterning is something interesting to explore. If you want to make it look nicer you might want to go back to the range of 30 for each level instead of 15. Best wishes, Joerg
From: owner-ferret_users@xxxxxxxx [owner-ferret_users@xxxxxxxx] on behalf of afwande juliet [afwandej965@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: 10 February 2016 20:58 To: Ansley C. Manke Cc: ferret_users Subject: Re: [ferret_users] WRF output negative values Thanks all
the negative values disapearedyes?let rainT=rainc+rainnc yes? fill/k=273/hlim=22:54/vlim=-12:25/levels=(0,120,15)(inf) rainT, xlong,xlat yes? go land 1 "" 1 yes? frame/file=test.gif On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 9:10 PM, Ansley C. Manke
<ansley.b.manke@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
|