U.S. Dept. of Commerce / NOAA / OAR / PMEL / Publications

Changes in submarine hydrothermal 3He/heat ratios as an indicator of magmatic/tectonic activity

Edward T. Baker

Pacific Marine Environmental Laboratory, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, 7600 Sand Point Way NE, Seattle, Washington 98115, USA

John E. Lupton

Marine Science Institute and Department of Geological Sciences, University of California, Santa Barbara, California 93106, USA

Nature, 346, 556-558 (1990)
Copyright ©1990 Macmillan Publishers Ltd. Further electronic distribution not allowed.

Gallery of Figures

Fig. 1. Potential density plotted against potential temperature for selected axial valley CTDT casts in 1986, 1987 and 1988. Each curve has a slope of -4.865C m Kg (shown by the straight line) except where hydrothermally affected. 1986 casts in the axial valley sampled only a thin horizon of ambient water (~27.635-27.640 ) between the steady-state plume and the overlying megaplume. Density of the water in the axial valley was significantly lower in 1986 because of enhanced vertical mixing of the lowermost 1,000 m by the megaplume discharge. Such vertical mixing does not affect the ambient - relationship. The maximum temperature anomaly, defined as the temperature deviation from the background trend along an isopycnal, was about the same on each cast. Insets show vertical profiles of the temperature and light-attenuation (proportional to the concentration of fine-grained hydrothermal precipitates) anomalies for each cast. Increased anomalies above 1,950 m in 1986 indicate the megaplume presence. Depth of the steady-state plume maximum was ~2,100 m each year. For each cast the light-attenuation and temperature anomalies go to zero at the same depth, supporting our interpretation of the vertical distribution of temperature anomaly.

Fig. 2. Areal maps of the steady-state plume as described by the maximum temperature anomaly between 2,000 m and 2,200 m along CTDT tow tracks (dashed lines) and vertical casts (crosses or solid symbols) in 1986, 1987 and 1988. He samples were collected during tows (open symbols) or on vertical casts (solid symbols); the locations of the Fig. 1 profiles are indicated. Hatched areas are the walls of the axial valley as defined by the 2,200-m bathymetric contour. In each year the plume was ~200 m thick and centred ~150 m above the floor of the axial valley (see Fig. 1). The plume was more extensive in 1986 than in either 1987 or 1988. The size and location of the 1986 megaplume is shown by shading.

Fig. 3. He concentration plotted against temperature anomaly for samples in steady-state plume from 1986, 1987 and 1988. Sample locations shown in Fig. 2. Least-squares trend of 1986 megaplume samples (which had a maximum temperature anomaly of ~0.26C) shown for comparison. Least-squares regression shows that the He/T ratio decreased from 4.4 to 2.4 to 1.3 10 cm STP g C from 1986 to 1988. A t-test analysis indicates that these ratios are all significantly different from each other at the 95% confidence level.

Go back to text of paper

PMEL Outstanding Papers

PMEL Publications Search

PMEL Homepage