Hello Ansley,
Thank you for the response.
I have a preliminary installation of LAS v8.0 that we are testing out for another project. When all goes well with that installation and configuration then we will upgrade our PO.DAAC LAS server.
How much of an effort is it to update the precision in LAS 7.3 code?
Thanks,
Rosanna.
------------------------------------------------------------
Rosanna Sumagaysay-Aouda Physical Oceanography DAAC http://podaac.jpl.nasa.gov/ 626.744.5565 (work) 818.497.5508 (cell) Mail Stop: Raytheon-299 Rosanna.M.Sumagaysay@xxxxxxxxxxxx ------------------------------------------------------------ "You can't depend on your eyes when your imagination is out of focus." - Mark Twain From: Ansley Manke [ansley.b.manke@xxxxxxxx]
Sent: Friday, April 11, 2014 9:48 AM To: Sumagaysay, Rosanna M (3980-Affiliate); las_users@xxxxxxxx Cc: Tsontos, Vardis M (398M) Subject: Re: [las_users] Precisions in ASCII and CSV outputs Hi Rosanna,
This isn't something that's directly configurable. I put the dataset into a LAS V8 server, where we've made a small change to the ASCII and CSV listings to show one or two more decimal places in the variable listed. Here's the start of a CSV listing of a line in longitude: and the ascii listing:Total Number of Records 32. DATA SET: http://thredds.jpl.nasa.gov/thredds/dodsC/GHRSST_NCDC-L4LRblend-GLOB-AVHRR_AMSR_OI_TIMEAGG/aggregate__ghrsst_NCDC-L4LRblend-GLOB-AVHRR_AMSR_OI.ncml X: 0.5 to 32.5 Column 1: DATETIME is Time String BAD FLAG : -1.E+34 Column 2: TIME is Time Coordinates (seconds since 01-JAN-1981 00:00:00) BAD FLAG : -1.E+34 Column 3: LON is Longitude (degrees_east) BAD FLAG : -1.E+34 Column 4: LAT is Latitude (degrees_north) BAD FLAG : -1.E+34 Column 5: ANALYSED_SST is analysed sea surface temperature (kelvin) BAD FLAG : -1.E+34 DATETIME,TIME,LON,LAT,ANALYSED_SST "01-JUN-2002",6.75734E+08,152.125,29.375,294.51 "01-JUN-2002",6.75734E+08,152.375,29.375,294.47 "01-JUN-2002",6.75734E+08,152.625,29.375,294.73 "01-JUN-2002",6.75734E+08,152.875,29.375,295.16 "01-JUN-2002",6.75734E+08,153.125,29.375,295.6 "01-JUN-2002",6.75734E+08,153.375,29.375,295.95 "01-JUN-2002",6.75734E+08,153.625,29.375,295.84 "01-JUN-2002",6.75734E+08,153.875,29.375,295.71 "01-JUN-2002",6.75734E+08,154.125,29.375,295.62 "01-JUN-2002",6.75734E+08,154.375,29.375,295.75 "01-JUN-2002",6.75734E+08,154.625,29.375,295.76 "01-JUN-2002",6.75734E+08,154.875,29.375,295.67 "01-JUN-2002",6.75734E+08,155.125,29.375,295.51 Would that be adequate? If you can update to LAS V8, you'd get this, or it is a change I could help you make in the LAS v7.3 there at jpl.VARIABLE : analysed sea surface temperature (kelvin) FILENAME : aggregate__ghrsst_NCDC-L4LRblend-GLOB-AVHRR_AMSR_OI.ncml FILEPATH : http://thredds.jpl.nasa.gov/thredds/dodsC/GHRSST_NCDC-L4LRblend-GLOB-AVHRR_AMSR_OI_TIMEAGG/ BAD FLAG : -54.53 SUBSET : 32 points (LONGITUDE) LATITUDE : 29.4N TIME : 01-JUN-2002 00:00 29.4N 152.1E 294.51 152.4E 294.47 152.6E 294.73 152.9E 295.16 153.1E 295.6 153.4E 295.95 153.6E 295.84 153.9E 295.71 154.1E 295.62 154.4E 295.75 154.6E 295.76 154.9E 295.67 155.1E 295.51 Ansley On 4/10/2014 3:00 PM, Sumagaysay, Rosanna M (3980-Affiliate) wrote:
|