Re: [las_users] Wrong output when selecting longitude-depth or time series

[dbali@xxxxxxxxxxx]

Hello again,

I tried the new version of LAS instead of the beta release but the
problems I was discribing still remain. Any ideas on how to get round to
it, would be most appreciated.

Thanks in advance,
Dimitra Bali


> Dimitra Bali,
>
> It looks like you are running the Beta version of v7.0 instead of the
> latest release.  There is a new tar file
> (ftp://ftp.pmel.noaa.gov/pub/las/las.v7.0.tar.gz) which has the latest
> software.  The new version has many bug fixes and enhancements.  When
> you have a chance, please try installing the latest and we'll go from
> there.
>
> Thanks,
> Roland
>
> Dimitra Bali wrote:
>> Hello to everyone,
>>
>> I have installed LAS v7.0 and it is available if someone wishes to
>> have a look at:
>>
>> http://poseidonlas.ath.hcmr.gr:8080/las/
>>
>> I have managed to figured out some problems that have occured during
>> the installation and set-up but I am currently stuck with two small
>> issues:
>>
>> 1. Whenever I try to select "Time series", "Longtitude" or "Depth" for
>> any of my datasets I get a wrong colour plot. If for example I select
>> an area or point with a stable Latitude of 36,738 I get a colour plot
>> with a stable Latitude of 55,1. The weird thing is that all the other
>> formats work fine. If for the same area I request an ASCII file,
>> NetCDF, Table of Values etc I get the correct data. The only thing
>> that is wrong is the colour plot. Also, the only case were the colour
>> plot works fine is at the Maps section.
>>
>> By trying a few point on the map, I figured out that the "leap" in
>> Latitude that appears to be happening is that the difference in the
>> Latitude I request and the Latitude I get, is a number that always
>> seems to be multiplied by 1.5
>>
>> 2. If I request the dataset "Europe: Weather forecast" (with any
>> variable) and select Latitude-Longtitude in "MAPS" I get a colout plot
>> which is correct but the top and bottom borders seem to be reversed
>> for some reason.
>>
>> Thank you in advance for any ideas,
>> Dimitra Bali.
>>
>
>
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean.
>
>



-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.