Re: multiple las servers and apache virtual hosts

[Tony Jolibois <Tony.Jolibois@xxxxxx>]

        

        

Hi
Phil,

I have set up 3 LAS on a single machine running Apache with virtual host,
but I have 3 tomcat.
So I don't know if I can help you, because I think you have trouble with
the single tomcat and not with Apache.

Tell me if you want explanation.

Tony
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 
Tony Jolibois
CLS, Direction Océanographie Spatiale 
Tel: (+33) (0) 561 393 797 
Internet:
http://www.cls.fr
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


At 06:12 16/01/2004 +0000, pbmoses@ucsd.edu wrote:
> Hello,
> I am currently setting up multiple las servers on a single machine running apache which is
> also 
> resolving virtual hosts. I have read the multiple las server on a single machine FAQ as
> well as the 
> archives in the mailing lists, however, I still seem to be having trouble reading running
> the multiple 
> las servers, although I am not sure if it is due to a virtual hosts problem or now. 
>
> Summary:
> Two virtual hosts (apache) on a single machine, both running las servers. 
> A single tomcat server running
> Both configurations have completely different directories and configurations. 
> When querying the database by hand, I see the proper URI associations in the las-->maps
> tables, 
> so I know all of the data is there.
> All data uploads and is populated when running genLas. 
> The catch is I can either see all of the server A data, (from A or B), all of server B
> data (from A or B) 
> , both the A and B data together but I can never seem to get data A with UI A while also
> being able 
> to see data B from UI B.
>
> Confusing enough yet?
> I am still relatively new with the las server, however I have torn this down and rebuilt
> it at least 5 
> times now so I am becoming very familiar with it, the last detail I have to fix is this
> problem with 
> multiple las servers on a single machines and the data staying independent. 
>
> If anyone can add suggestions or hints, please let me know. Log files are available but I
> think it is 
> more something that I have not done properly at this point. 
>
>
> Thanks,
> Phil