[Thread Prev][Thread Next][Index]
Re: Strange time axis inconsitencies...
Gary,
It depends on your axis definition. Perhaps you need to define it in
such a way that prevents slipping. E.g.,
define axis/t="16-jan-0001:12":"16-dec-0300:12"/np=3600 .....
Mark
On Feb 8, 2:16pm, Gary Strand wrote:
> Subject: Strange time axis inconsitencies...
>
> I've got 300 years of monthly model run data that I've put into netCDF. For
> some strange reason, the time axis appears to be "slipping" as seen by
FERRET.
>
> For example:
>
> Time stamp Years since start
> 1: 16-JAN-0001 0.0417
> 2: 15-FEB-0001 0.1250
> 3: 18-MAR-0001 0.2083
> 4: 17-APR-0001 0.2917
> 5: 17-MAY-0001 0.3750
> 6: 17-JUN-0001 0.4583
> [....]
> 3596: 06-JUN-0300 299.6250
> 3597: 06-JUL-0300 299.7083
> 3598: 05-AUG-0300 299.7917
> 3599: 05-SEP-0300 299.8750
> 3600: 05-OCT-0300 299.9583
>
> How come the last time in calendar form is off by ~75 days, despite the fact
> that the delta T is correct? I know that in 300 years there's 75 leap days,
> but the last column takes that into account.
>
> Here's the netCDF specification of the time axis:
>
> double time(time) ;
> time:long_name = "time" ;
> time:units = "years since 0001-01-01" ;
>
> Thanks for any help anyone can offer.
> --
> Gary Strand
> strandwg@ucar.edu
http://www.cgd.ucar.edu/ccr/strandwg
>-- End of excerpt from Gary Strand
--
Mark Verschell NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center
verschell@neptune.gsfc.nasa.gov Code 970/Lab. for Hydrospheric Proc.
301-614-5669 Fax: 301-614-5666 Greenbelt, MD 20771
USQC Certified: 100% Microsoft Free
[Thread Prev][Thread Next][Index]
Dept of Commerce /
NOAA /
OAR /
PMEL /
TMAP
Contact Us | Privacy Policy | Disclaimer | Accessibility Statement