Hi, You're right. In PyFerret we haven't got this spacing right yet
in all instances. Have you set the tic-mark size to a small
value? I think this is the only way to control the placement of
those numbers for now. Compare these two plots; the first looks
fine, the second shows the problem you're describing: yes? set win/asp=.6 yes? plot/y=1/x=1/t=1-jan-1983:1-dec-1985 uwnd yes? ppl tics,0,0,0,0 yes? plot/y=1/x=1/t=1-jan-1983:1-dec-1985 uwnd
A possible workaround might be to set the 'large' tics for year
boundaries. Try these settings, PPL TICS .0,.2,.0,.2,0,0 or, PPL TICS .0,.2,.0,.2,-1,-1
On 5/8/2019 1:13 PM, saurabh rathore
wrote:
--
Ansley Manke NOAA/PMEL Science Data Integration Group 7600 Sand Point Way NE 206-526-6246 |