Hi Golla,
To follow up, an easy way to make the check that Steve is suggesting
is to do a SHADE plot with exactly the same qualifiers and region as
your FILL command. That should show whether this is the issue.
Ansley
On 3/15/2013 7:16 AM, Steve Hankin
wrote:
Hi Golla,
Check and see if there are lots of missing values in your data.
The FILL command requires adjacent valid points in order to trace
the boundaries of the color changes, so it is not suitable when
there are lots of embedded missing values.
If you regrid using an @ave regridding transformation, then the
coarser grid will have valid data as long as there is at least one
valid point from the fine grid within the coarse grid cell. So
the number of missing values is greatly reduced.
- Steve
On 3/15/2013 12:21 AM, golla
nageswararao wrote:
Hi all,
Now-a-days I am facing some problem with the high
resolution time series data (5 second).
Suppose I am having data in z axis and t axis (5 sec) for
suppose 5 days. When I try to plot the depth-time section
using fill command, it is not plotting anything (blank plot)
but scale bar will be there.The same data when I plotted
with shade command, only second half of the data is plotted.
Then, I checked whether data is there inside the .nc file or
not. Suprising data is there inside. If I regrid this data
to a coarser resolution in t-axis, again full data is
plotting both either with shade and fill commands. I think
this a bug or ferret is not able plot high resolution
datasets. I didnt understand this weird behaviour. Any help
in this regard is appreciated.
Thanks in advance.
--
With Best regards,
G.NageswaraRao.
|