Hi Ansley,
Thanks for investigating.
Another control for the
formatting of digits in the labels drawn on contour lines is a
fourth argument to the /LEVELS qualifier. [. . .]
Thank you for the instruction! In fact, I should've expanded
on the subject. What I was actually trying to do was
more like
contour/lev=(-5)(-2)(-1)(-0.5)(0.5)(1)(2)(5)/sigdig=1 . . .
In this case, the fourth-argument mechanism would have been
a very cumbersome
lev=(-5,-5,1,1)(-3,-3,1,1)(-0.5,-0.5,1,1) . . .
or something like that.
So, I've actually had another proposal regarding this issue.
As you can see from this example, the SIGDIG mechanism is
more convenient than the fourth-argument mechanism in some
cases.
So, it would be nice if the SIGDIG mechanism be extended
to cover all functionalities of the fourth-argument mechanism.
In particular "SIGDIG=-1" for integer format would be very useful
and "SIGDIG=0" for omitting the fractional part ("10.", "5.", etc.)
would be nice (or at least good for the sake of consistency).
Cheers,
Ryo