On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 3:02 AM, Ansley Manke
<Ansley.B.Manke@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi,
There is no reason that the same exact input data and the same
script would produce different results. Is the input file from the
other PC really the same as the one you had used? Different inputs
would be the most likely cause. If you are able to reproduce that
behavior we would be happy to look into what's happening.
Ansley
On 11/14/2011 10:53 AM, golla nageswararao wrote:
Nothing much....
I wrote a jnl file using commands fft_re, fft_im and inverse fft
for filtering low frequency signals from SSHA data. It worked very
well. Since I lost the listed netcdf file, I ran the same jnl file
with same dataset in some other pc but strangely output of the jnl
was entirely different. What could be the reason?
Thanks in advance.
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 10:42 PM, Ansley
Manke
<Ansley.B.Manke@xxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Hi
We would need to see more details about this. There is no
reason that should occur.
Ansley
On 11/13/2011 6:46 PM, golla nageswararao wrote:
Hi all,
I recently used fft_re, fft_im and inverse fft for
considering only desired signals in my time series
data and I could achieved it. But when I used the same
jnl, same dataset two days before and run it, the
results are different. Why it is so like that? The
data was not filtered. How could it happen like
that...?
Thanks in advance.
--
With Best regards,
G.NageswaraRao,
--
With Best regards,
G.NageswaraRao,