Hi Pierre,Thanks very much for the suggestion. It doesn't seem to be changing my plots any though. That is, the plots created with SHADE and then FILL/OVERLAY look the same as just FILL.
It looks like the interpolation is happening right at the edge of the MASKed area so perhaps overlaying the MASKed land area again with no ocean data would work or at least help. I'm not sure how to do this though.
I've been playing with mask_outline.jnl and it does help but it basically just writes a black border over part of the purple interpolated area and there is still a purple fringe around it. It would be best if the interpolation could be turned off right at the boundary.
Does this seem possible? Thanks, Steve ______________________________________________________________________ Steve Cousins, Ocean Modeling Group Email: cousins@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx Marine Sciences, 452 Aubert Hall http://rocky.umeoce.maine.edu Univ. of Maine, Orono, ME 04469 Phone: (207) 581-4302 On Thu, 26 Jun 2008, Pierre.St-Laurent@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
Steve, A trick that works for me is to first shade the field, and then overlay a fill of the same field. This way I get interpolated values in the interior and non-interpolated values over the boundaries. Hope it helps, Pierre Steve Cousins a écrit :Is there a way to use FILL but not have it interpolate values at the boundary of the masked and unmasked areas, ie the coast line? Thanks, Steve ______________________________________________________________________ Steve Cousins, Ocean Modeling Group Email: cousins@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx Marine Sciences, 452 Aubert Hall http://rocky.umeoce.maine.edu Univ. of Maine, Orono, ME 04469 Phone: (207) 581-4302