[Thread Prev][Thread Next][Index]
RE: publication quality plots?
Adding (or replacing) the text with a program like Adobe Illustrator can improve the plots tremendously. For important plots, I typically create them as postscript in Ferret and then touch-up the text, move around the color bar, etc. in Illustrator. The downside of this is that it can be a bit time consuming. If I had the ability to change things in Ferret, one of them would be to output true postscript font text. One of the few points where I give NCAR Graphics credit is its ability to do this. All the code necessary to get any output is its downside. :-) Overall, Ferret wins hands down as my favorite graphics program because of its breadth of capabilities and ease of use.
-Bill
_____________________________
William I. Gustafson Jr., Ph.D.
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
P.O. Box 999, MSIN K9-30
Richland, WA 99352, USA
Voice & Msg: (509)372-6110
http://www.pnl.gov/atmos_sciences
> ----------
> From: owner-ferret_users@pmel.noaa.gov on behalf of Ansley Manke
> Sent: Thursday, July 29, 2004 2:13 PM
> To: Goran Georgievski
> Cc: ferret_users@noaa.gov
> Subject: Re: publication quality plots?
>
> Hi Goran,
> I will make a few comments, but I also hope that others in this list who have
> experience using Ferret to make plots for publication will add their suggestions.
>
> The metafiles can get big, as they are ASCII files with all of the commands
> specifying graphics settings and each plot element as it is added to the plot.
> The postscript files generated with gksm2ps are also ASCII with a similar
> amount of information. If your plot has several overlays then all the information
> used to plot each layer is in these files. A gif image is smaller, as it contains only
> the color flag for each pixel in the final plot. So it is not surprising that metafiles
> and postscript files are bigger than gif files, though I agree that 92 mb is big!
>
> The batch postscript mode makes graphics calls to write postscript directly
> from the GKS graphics software, so it does not contain the same postscript
> commands, so the ideas in the FAQ, How can I control line thickness when
> I translate a metafile to a postscript file? do not apply to postscript generated
> from the batch mode of Ferret.
>
> Did you try at the TR font in Ferret? It is somewhat thicker and may have a better
> appearance. Also making the text bigger helps. If these don't give you an acceptable
> output I wonder if a solution might be to create your final plot as a gif or postscript in
> batch mode but without the text, and then adding the labels using a separate graphics
> program. Does anyone have suggestions for tools Goran might use?
>
> Ansley
>
>
> Goran Georgievski wrote:
>
>
> Hello All,
>
> According to instructions found in FAQ (How can I make publication-quality
> Polar Stereographic Plots? and other) I have produced some figures but I have
> some problems with outputing to postscript file.
> I try to produce publication quality ps file on several different ways but
> none of them seem to be satisfying. I describe them and ask for your
> suggestion to complete the task: produce the publication quality plot!
>
> 1. I try to produce metafile since I am changing aspect ratio this is
> recommended method to produce the ps file. Featuring metafile is about 92 MB
> (!) and when I try to produce the ps file on the machine with low memory
> resources it chrasehs befor producing ps file completly. On the machine with
> 1 GB memory it produces blured and patchy ps file about 72 MB in size.
>
> (!) Additional note is that I do not use so extremly large data set and I
> really do not know why output file should be so huge. For producing a plot I
> have used about 5 files (topography, masks, and various data) with 352x160
> matrix size (only one vertical level) and with 22 time steps. I was also >
> using geo_borders_intermed.nc file for puting coastlines and rievrs on the
> plot.
>
> 2. I try to output the plot to the gif file. Featuring gif file is 94 KB in
> size and it looks ok, except numbers used by shade key and coordinate axis
> values. I try to change the font but this is the first time that I realized
> that all the fonts available in ferret does not look good. Even if you look
> at the picture available at the
> http://ferret.wrc.noaa.gov/Ferret/FAQ/custom_plots/polar_stereographic.html
> you will see that for example C looks like eaten.
>
> 3. I try to aquire screenshoot with the gimp, but this is obviously pointless
> since output on the scree from ferret is not correct.
>
> 4. Finnaly I produced postscript in the batch mode (I have to quit changing
> the window size). It is 69 MB in size but fonts are not good as before. I try
> to change the ps file as decribed in FAQ (Changing line thickness in
> PostScript files) but greping the ps file it turns out that there is no line
> 3000 div setlinewidth
> but
> /w {setlinewidth} bind def
> and I do not know anything about postscript and what to do with that.
> However converting with ps2pdf pdf file is about 13 MB and everything looks
> great (even numbers and not only on the screen but hard copy too). But for
> some reason I need to have postscript file. Trying to covert pdf with gimp to
> ps did not give the result.
>
> My question is:How can I really produce publication quality plot with the
> ferret when all the fonts seem to have bad apearence even on the screen?
>
> Additional question perhaps does not belong to this list but if someone could
> satisfy my curiosity I would be thankful:
> I would also like to know why pdf file is smaller but of better quality than
> ps, or how is it posible at all to produce correct pdf file from bad ps file?
>
> I am using ferret version 5.51, 5.53, and 5.6 on various Linux boxes (built
> with g77/gcc v2.96).
>
> Thanks for your support,
> Goran
>
>
> Ps: I do not really feel comfortable with the idea to switch to another
> visualisation tool...
>
>
>
>
>
[Thread Prev][Thread Next][Index]
Dept of Commerce /
NOAA /
OAR /
PMEL /
TMAP
Contact Us | Privacy Policy | Disclaimer | Accessibility Statement