U.S. Dept. of Commerce / NOAA / OAR / PMEL / Publications


An Example of Fisheries Oceanography: Walleye Pollock in Alaskan Waters

Jim Schumacher

NOAA, Pacific Marine Environmental Laboratory, 7600 Sand Point Way NE, Seattle, WA 98115

Arthur W. Kendall, Jr.

NOAA, Alaska Fisheries Science Center, Seattle, Washington

U.S. National Report to International Union of Geodesy and Geophysics 1991–1994, Rev. Geophys., Suppl., 1153–1163 (1995)
Copyright ©1995 by the American Geophysical Union. Further electronic distribution is not allowed.

Bering Sea FOCI

Research Strategy

Recommendations from an International Symposium on Pollock [Aron and Balsiger, 1989] provide the research objectives for FOCI: determine stock structure in the Bering Sea and its relationship to physical features, and understand recruitment processes in the eastern Bering Sea. Both of these have direct implication to management of the vast resources that exist in U.S., Russian and international waters. To attain the first objective, field and modeling studies have investigated circulation throughout the deep basin. Another component seeks to establish genetic "finger-prints" to evaluate stock structure. In addressing the second objective, we are investigating differences between survival of eggs and larvae over the deep waters to that over the adjacent shelf. A newly established component is comparing habitats of juvenile animals around the Pribilof Islands.

Pollock Life History

Many of the characteristics of walleye pollock early life history are common to all populations of the species. In the Bering Sea, however, both the population structure and early life history pattern are much more complex than in the Gulf of Alaska. Genetic characteristics [Mulligan et al., 1992] and length-at-age and fecundity relationships [Hinckley, 1987] suggest several spawning stocks exist. The importance of pollock in the ecosystem [e.g., Springer, 1992], as well as the relationships and interchange among stocks are largely unknown. Spawning begins earlier in the year in some parts of the Bering Sea than it does in Shelikof Strait and apparently different groups of fish spawn at different times and places. We began our efforts focusing on the population that spawns in February over the southeastern slope, and supported a substantial fishery in the late 1980's. Here we found indications that some of the eggs and larvae were much deeper in the water column (400 m) than we had found in Shelikof Strait. Also, feeding conditions did not seem to be adequate for optimal growth in this area. We found larvae associated with eddies in this area as we had in Shelikof Strait. Our attention is now focused on the spawning (April-June) that occurs over the continental shelf of the southeastern Bering Sea.

Basin Circulation and Mesoscale Features

Prior to FOCI research many schematics existed of circulation in the Bering Sea, and wind stress was considered to provide the primary forcing [Hughes et al., 1974]. Results from FOCI have refined our knowledge of circulation (Figure 2) and meteorological forcing over the basin from both observations [Stabeno and Reed, 1994] and model studies [Overland et al., 1994]. A cyclonic gyre dominates circulation over the basin, with a western boundary current (Kamchatka Current) along the Asian side of the basin [Reed et al., 1993]. This gyre is mainly an extension of the Alaskan Stream, and the majority of volume transport enters through Near Strait (~10 × 106 m3 s-1) and exits via the Kamchatka Current [Stabeno and Reed, 1994]. When instabilities in the Alaskan Stream inhibit flow into the Bering Sea through Near Strait [Stabeno and Reed, 1992], transport in the Kamchatka Current can be reduced by ~50%. Such conditions existed from 1990 to 1991; the return to normal flow conditions occurred in late 1991 [Reed and Stabeno, 1993]. A climatology of the wind forcing shows that eastward- and northward-propagating storm systems dominate the surface stress at short periods (<1 month), which serves principally to mix the upper ocean [Bond et al., 1994]. At longer periods (>1 month), the estimated wind-driven transport accounts for roughly one-half of the observed transport within the Kamchatka Current. The interannual variations in the transports are ~25% of the mean.

Figure 2. Upper Panel: A schematic of the general circulation over the basin of the Bering Sea as derived from ongoing FOCI research (after Stabeno and Reed [1994]). Lower Panel: A schematic of circulation over the eastern shelf based on previous results [Schumacher and Kinder, 1983], together with more recent satellite-tracked buoy [Stabeno and Reed, 1994] and moored current observations [Schumacher and Reed, 1992]. ACC is the Alaska Coastal Current, which enters through Unimak Pass, and W represents regions with weak or statistically insignificant mean flow.

The flux (~3.0 × 106 m3 s-1) of Alaskan Stream waters through the eastern passes (Amchitka and Amukta Passes) has a profound impact on regional water properties and circulation [Schumacher and Stabeno, 1994; Reed et al., 1994; Reed and Stabeno, 1994]. These waters then flow northwestward along the slope [Schumacher and Reed, 1992], carrying a subsurface temperature maximum that can be traced hundreds of kilometers. The southeastern basin waters are also rich in eddies, some of which are formed by flow through Amukta Pass [Schumacher and Stabeno, 1994].


Return to previous section or go to next section

PMEL Outstanding Papers

PMEL Publications Search

PMEL Homepage