Hi-
I'm glad to hear you figured it out. Thank you for writing back.
Ansley
On 11/15/2011 10:42 AM, golla nageswararao wrote:
Thanks for ur reply..
I could found out whats the problem is...It is my mistake
only......
It is because I forgot to change 168 hr to 7 days ...
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 3:02 AM, Ansley
Manke <Ansley.B.Manke@xxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Hi,
There is no reason that the same exact input data and the
same script would produce different results. Is the input
file from the other PC really the same as the one you had
used? Different inputs would be the most likely cause. If
you are able to reproduce that behavior we would be happy to
look into what's happening.
Ansley
On 11/14/2011 10:53 AM, golla nageswararao wrote:
Nothing much....
I wrote a jnl file using commands fft_re, fft_im and
inverse fft for filtering low frequency signals from
SSHA data. It worked very well. Since I lost the
listed netcdf file, I ran the same jnl file with same
dataset in some other pc but strangely output of the
jnl was entirely different. What could be the reason?
Thanks in advance.
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 10:42
PM, Ansley Manke <Ansley.B.Manke@xxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Hi
We would need to see more details about this.
There is no reason that should occur.
Ansley
On 11/13/2011 6:46 PM, golla nageswararao
wrote:
Hi all,
I recently used fft_re, fft_im and
inverse fft for considering only desired
signals in my time series data and I could
achieved it. But when I used the same jnl,
same dataset two days before and run it,
the results are different. Why it is so
like that? The data was not filtered. How
could it happen like that...?
Thanks in advance.
--
With Best regards,
G.NageswaraRao,
--
With Best regards,
G.NageswaraRao,
--
With Best regards,
G.NageswaraRao,
|