Re: "landform" dataset instead of etopoXXX...

To: strandwg@xxxxxxxx (Gary Strand), Ferret Users Mailing List <ferret_users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: "landform" dataset instead of etopoXXX...
From: Peter deVoil <devoilp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2002 10:52:55 +1000
In-reply-to: Message from strandwg@ucar.edu (Gary Strand)of "Tue, 15 Jan 2002 16:22:38 MST."<200201152322.QAA12672@sunray2.cgd.ucar.edu>
Sender: owner-ferret_users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Hi,
>What I'm thinking is that Antarctica and Greenland (for example) show up, 
quite
>properly, shaded for their elevations, but most people think of both as being
>white, since they're 100% snow (or ice).
Not to mention that dot in southern central australia (lake eyre). There's no 
ocean there..

Yours,
pdeV.

References:
- "landform" dataset instead of etopoXXX...
  - From: Gary Strand

Previous by thread: "landform" dataset instead of etopoXXX...
Next by thread: mask values in NetCDF file

[Thread Prev][Thread Next][Index]

Dept of Commerce / NOAA / OAR / PMEL / TMAP